Changes to the UK’s listing regime were designed to open up the corporate bond market to retail investors. But regulatory reform on its own hasn’t yet been enough to stimulate new issuance. What needs to happen next?
For years, ordinary investors have had little opportunity to buy corporate bonds. Most listed issues were sold in denominations of £100,000 or more, leaving private investors reliant on bond funds rather than direct ownership.
Rachel Reeves’ Leeds Reforms and the new Public Offers and Admissions to Trading regime were meant to change that. Their aim was to make UK capital markets more competitive and widen retail participation. For bonds, the most eye-catching change was the removal of the old distinction between “wholesale” and “retail” disclosure standards, opening the door to smaller-denomination bonds that could be bought in much more manageable sizes. The rules also aimed to ensure any borrower could use the market. However, it also gave an example of the type of bond that might be suitable for broad retail distribution – A Plain Vanilla Listed Bond (PVLB) – listing a series of characteristics which included senior unsecured ranking, and issuance by a borrower with equity listed on the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)’s Official List.
On paper, this should have been a meaningful re-opening of the UK retail bond market. A wider choice of direct bonds would give investors another way to earn fixed income, diversify away from equities and funds, and match investments more closely to their income needs. Yet the early signs are cautious: Since the new regime came into force, there has been no rush of new small-denomination corporate bond issues.
The main example so far is not a new issue, but the conversion of existing London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) bonds. LSEG converted £1.4 billion of outstanding sterling notes so that they could qualify as PVLBs and be recognised as Access Bonds. It proves the mechanics can work, but it is still a limited test: converting blue-chip debt is not the same as persuading companies to issue new retail bonds from the outset.
That highlights the puzzle: if smaller denominations are now possible and investors want income, why are issuers not coming forward?
The first answer is commercial. No one has yet demonstrated to a large corporation, already able to raise money in deep international capital markets, that a UK retail bond is worth the additional effort. For many such issuers, the wholesale market is efficient, familiar and capable of delivering scale. Retail access may be a public policy objective, but it has not yet been translated into a compelling issuer proposition.
The second answer is regulatory. The regime places considerable reliance on the banks and brokers (“Manufacturers”) leading transactions to determine whether a bond is suitable for wide retail distribution. The PVLB category created a safe harbour. Outside it, lead managers will be much more cautious, even where the credit is strong and the structure is straightforward.
That creates an awkward gap. The issuers most likely to qualify may have least need of retail money, while some borrowers that might naturally interest income investors and may be more dependent on the sterling market – including housing associations, universities, investment trusts and certain Real Estate Investment Trusts – are not PVLBs.
The UK has taken an important step by removing some of the biggest structural barriers to retail bond issuance and ownership. But a rule change is not the same thing as a market. A broader, carefully controlled approach – based on credit quality, simplicity and transparency could support the creation of a diverse retail bond market. Otherwise, the UK risks building a better framework without achieving the promised revival.
Talk to our team
If you’d like to discuss the evolving retail bond market, small-denomination issuance or what the changing regulatory landscape could mean for your organisation, get in touch with our team.
